BART
Why “taking BART” from Oakland to San Francisco costs more than advertised in this billboard.
Rowdy Energy Drinks
Case Name (Date)
Cave et al. v. Rowdy Beverage, Inc.
24-cv-58, M.D. Fla.
(Jan. 2024)
Lake et al. v. Rowdy Beverage, Inc.
23-cv-6114, N.D. Cal.
(Nov. 2023)
Product/Service
Rowdy energy drinks
Allegations
Falsely marketing that drinks contain “No Preservatives” when they contain at least two (citric acid and ascorbic acid)
Status
Cave case: Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Lake case: Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
The Latest
Breaking Down the Relationship between Brands and Teens
Today’s teenagers are uniquely positioned in the marketing world.
FTC Bans Fake Reviews
New rule also targets paid reviews.
Virgin Atlantic: ‘100% Sustainable Aviation Fuel’
Ad regulator finds term potentially misleading in context of radio ad.
College HUNKS’ Unattractive Side
TINA.org reader says moving company failed to live up to its ads. She’s not the only one.