The FTC is not anti-direct selling. It’s pro-truth in advertising.
The DSA misses the mark.
Rowdy Energy Drink
Case Name (Date)
Palacios et al. v. Rowdy Beverage, Inc.
24-cv-288, S.D. Cal.
(Feb. 2024)
Product/Service
Rowdy Energy Drinks
Allegations
Falsely marketing drinks as containing no preservatives or artificial flavors when they contain a preservative ingredient (citric acid) and an artificial flavoring ingredient (DL malic acid)
Status
Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
The Latest
Ocean Spray Cranberry Juice Blend
TINA.org reader takes issue with this product’s deceptive packaging.
Lens.com
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
On Shoes
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Junk Fees at JFK, LaGuardia and Newark Airports
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?