Magic Styler’s Refund Policy
This risk-free trial might have you pulling your hair out.
November 2014: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement.
January 2014: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement of a class-action lawsuit against Global Concepts Limited for allegedly falsely advertising Riddex devices. The complaint, which was originally filed in 2012, alleges that the company advertises that the devices will repel pests such as rodents, roaches, ants, and spiders by turning a “home’s wiring system into a pest repellent force field” when, according to the plaintiffs, the devices do not perform as advertised. According to the settlement terms, class members may receive either a $14.95 refund or an additional device for each device purchased. In addition, the company has agreed to change its marketing materials. For more information, go to www.riddexclasssettlement.com. (In Re Global Concepts Limited, Inc., d/b/a Global TV Concepts, LTD., et al., Case No. 12-cv-23064, S. D. FL.).
This risk-free trial might have you pulling your hair out.
Proposed new earnings claim rule comes three years after TINA.org comment to FTC.
How negative feelings surrounding menstruation have influenced period product marketing.
Why these products may leave you wanting more.
Class-action lawsuits target preservative-free claims.