
1st Phorm’s ‘110% Money-Back Guarantee’
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Wilson et al. v. Revolution Beauty, Inc.
23-cv-2190, N.D. Cal.
(May 2023)
Revolution Eye Makeup
Misleadingly marketing products as eye makeup when they are not safe to use near the eyes
Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.