This Secretive Company Built An Empire By Hawking Bad Financial And Health Advice On Facebook
Emily Baker-White, Forbes
RevitaLash and RevitaBrow
Case Name (Date)
Rush et al. v. Athena Cosmetics, Inc.
24-cv-8542, C.D. Cal.
(Oct. 2024)
Slattery et al. v. Athena Cosmetics, Inc.
23-cv-10078, C.D. Cal.
(Nov. 2023)
Product/Service
RevitaLash and RevitaBrow
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing products as serums that are safe to use to improve the appearance of eyelashes and eyebrows without warning of the serious side effects and risks associated with using one of the ingredients in them (dihdroxy difluoro ethylcloprostenolamide, or DDDE) near the eyes
Status
Rush case: Consolidated with Slattery v. Athena Cosmetics
Slattery case: Pending
The Latest
Instaflex Advanced
Can this joint supplement back up its stiff promises?
Renewal by Andersen Reported for Making Deceptive Made in USA Claims
MADISON, CONN. July 1, 2025 – Renewal by Andersen, which bills itself as “one of largest replacement window companies in the country,” is deceptively marketing its products as Made in…
Renewal by Andersen’s ‘Made in USA’ Window Dressing
TINA.org files FTC complaint against company.
Ariat’s WorkHog Patriot Boots
Don’t let the American flags fool you.