Roblox Bid for Ad Riches Collides With Wary Sponsors, Developers
Cecilia D’Anastasio, Bloomberg
RevitaLash and RevitaBrow
Case Name (Date)
Rush et al. v. Athena Cosmetics, Inc.
24-cv-8542, C.D. Cal.
(Oct. 2024)
Slattery et al. v. Athena Cosmetics, Inc.
23-cv-10078, C.D. Cal.
(Nov. 2023)
Product/Service
RevitaLash and RevitaBrow
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing products as serums that are safe to use to improve the appearance of eyelashes and eyebrows without warning of the serious side effects and risks associated with using one of the ingredients in them (dihdroxy difluoro ethylcloprostenolamide, or DDDE) near the eyes
Status
Rush case: Consolidated with Slattery v. Athena Cosmetics
Slattery case: Pending
The Latest
UIC Aspire Grant
TINA.org digs into school’s debt-free claims.
TINA.org Joins Consumer Advocates to Keep FTC Bipartisan
Why agency independence is in the best interests of consumers.
Tracksmith’s ‘100 Mile Guarantee’
What exactly does this running brand mean by “your return is on us”?
AriZona Blueberry White Tea: ‘100% Natural White Tea’
Be wary of “natural” claims.