Saatva
TINA.org pulls back the covers on this company’s Made in USA marketing.
RevitaLash and RevitaBrow
Case Name (Date)
Rush et al. v. Athena Cosmetics, Inc.
24-cv-8542, C.D. Cal.
(Oct. 2024)
Slattery et al. v. Athena Cosmetics, Inc.
23-cv-10078, C.D. Cal.
(Nov. 2023)
Product/Service
RevitaLash and RevitaBrow
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing products as serums that are safe to use to improve the appearance of eyelashes and eyebrows without warning of the serious side effects and risks associated with using one of the ingredients in them (dihdroxy difluoro ethylcloprostenolamide, or DDDE) near the eyes
Status
Rush case: Consolidated with Slattery v. Athena Cosmetics
Slattery case: Pending
The Latest
Monetizing Minors: Eric Befumo (aka Big Justice)
Brand partnerships worthy of a big “doom!”
Instacart’s AI-Enabled Pricing Experiments May Be Inflating Your Grocery Bill, CR and Groundwork Collaborative Investigation Finds
Derek Kravitz, Consumer Reports
Most Deceptive Ads of 2025
Here were some of the worst ads TINA.org investigated this year.
Cartice
Watch out for this company’s sketchy sale.