The FTC is not anti-direct selling. It’s pro-truth in advertising.
The DSA misses the mark.
In April 2014, a class-action lawsuit was filed against the owners of Revel Casino for allegedly deceptively advertising that the casino would refund all losses on slot machines during the month of July 2013 when, in reality, consumers did not receive cash refunds and only received “free slot play coupons” with many restrictions. (Stern et al v. Revel AC, Inc., Revel AC, LLC, Revel Entertainment Group, LLC, and Chatham Asset Management, LLC, Case No. 14-cv-02056, D. NJ.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits against Revel Casino and TINA.org’s coverage of the casino, click here.
The DSA misses the mark.
TINA.org reader takes issue with this product’s deceptive packaging.
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?