1st Phorm’s ‘110% Money-Back Guarantee’
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Iglesias et al v. For Life Products, LLC
21-cv-1147, N.D. Cal.
(Feb. 2021)
Rejuvenate cleaning products, including All Floors Cleaner, Cabinet & Furniture Restorer, Grout Deep Cleaner, and others
Falsely marketing cleaning products as “SAFE FOR PETS & KIDS” when they contain ingredients that are harmful to pets and people
Misleadingly designing the “Safe for Pets & Kids” seal to look like products have been objectively evaluated and certified by an independent third party when they have not
Pending
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.