VIZIO Flat-Screen Televisions
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing televisions as having “sensational picture quality” and “best-in-class picture processing” when they suffer from power failures due to a defect
Koenig et al. v. VIZIO, Inc.
BC702266, California state court – Los Angeles
(2018)
VIZIO LCD televisions
Falsely marketing that televisions have higher refresh rates than they actually do
Settled
(Final approval granted)
https://refreshrateclassaction.com/
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing televisions as having “sensational picture quality” and “best-in-class picture processing” when they suffer from power failures due to a defect
Allegations: Failing to adequately disclose that Vizio Smart TVs have tracking software
TINA.org reader takes issue with this product’s deceptive packaging.
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?
Supplement maker agrees to pay $750K to settle deceptive health claims lawsuit.