BullyKamp
FDA warns that this pet company’s marketing bites off more than it can chew.
Progenex More Muscle
June 2016: A federal judge dismissed this case When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled..
September 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Progenex Holdings for allegedly misleadingly marketing Progenex More Muscle, a dietary supplement. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the company misleadingly represents that the product contains 20% more Branched Chain Amino Acids (BCAAs) than regular Whey Protein Isolate (WPI) when such claims are actually not true. In addition, the complaint alleges that the company falsely markets the product as being enhanced with growth factors when, in reality, the product does not contain any growth factors at all. (Lesher et al v. Progenex Holdings, LLC, Case No. 15-cv-7841, N. D. IL.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding supplements and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
The Latest
CFPB Proposes Paycheck Advance Rule
TINA.org joins coalition of consumer organizations in support of the proposed rule
ARMRA Colostrum Supplements
Company distances itself from touted “studies” while continuing to use deceptive health claims.
Amazon $700 Weekly Vehicle Advertisement Program
Can you earn a salary just by placing a small sticker on your car?
CATrends: Fish Oil Supplements Marketed to Support Heart Health
Lawsuits accuse companies of using deceptive claims to reel in consumers.