The Most Deceptive Ads of 2025
Here were some of the worst ads TINA.org investigated this year.
June 2016: A federal judge dismissed this case When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled..
September 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Progenex Holdings for allegedly misleadingly marketing Progenex More Muscle, a dietary supplement. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the company misleadingly represents that the product contains 20% more Branched Chain Amino Acids (BCAAs) than regular Whey Protein Isolate (WPI) when such claims are actually not true. In addition, the complaint alleges that the company falsely markets the product as being enhanced with growth factors when, in reality, the product does not contain any growth factors at all. (Lesher et al v. Progenex Holdings, LLC, Case No. 15-cv-7841, N. D. IL.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding supplements and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
Here were some of the worst ads TINA.org investigated this year.
Watch out for this company’s sketchy sale.
It’s not you Thomas, it’s Pixel’s 100x zoom, actually.
Some class-action settlements that left consumers out in the cold.
Don’t let this post-trip extension take you for a bumpy ride.