
1st Phorm’s ‘110% Money-Back Guarantee’
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Hedgecock et al v. Virtual Dining Conceps, LLC d/b/a MrBeast Burger
21CV39843, Oregon State Court – Multnomah County
(Oct. 2021)
MrBeast Burger fast food
Falsely advertising lower prices than consumers are actually charged
Pending
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.