NCPW 2025: Fighting against Deceptive Marketing
If you’ve been misled by an ad, regulators want to hear from you. We do too.
In January 2014 a federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement to a class-action lawsuit against Telebrands for, among other things, allegedly misleadingly labeling and advertising the Pocket Hose. According to the settlement terms, class members with proof of purchase may receive a refund of up to $20. For more information, go to www.hosesettlement.com. (Arreguin et al v. Telebrands and Does 1-10, Case No. CIVRS1307798, Superior Court for the State of California, County of San Bernadino).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding the marketing of the Pocket Hose and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding the marketing of garden hoses and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
If you’ve been misled by an ad, regulators want to hear from you. We do too.
It’s easier to rack up hidden fees than it is to cancel.
The only thing more “ridiculous” than the touted benefits is the cancellation process.
Under a proposed bill, theaters could be fined for making moviegoers guess.
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.