The Most Deceptive Ads of 2025
Here were some of the worst ads TINA.org investigated this year.
In January 2014 a federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement to a class-action lawsuit against Telebrands for, among other things, allegedly misleadingly labeling and advertising the Pocket Hose. According to the settlement terms, class members with proof of purchase may receive a refund of up to $20. For more information, go to www.hosesettlement.com. (Arreguin et al v. Telebrands and Does 1-10, Case No. CIVRS1307798, Superior Court for the State of California, County of San Bernadino).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding the marketing of the Pocket Hose and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding the marketing of garden hoses and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
Here were some of the worst ads TINA.org investigated this year.
Watch out for this company’s sketchy sale.
It’s not you Thomas, it’s Pixel’s 100x zoom, actually.
Some class-action settlements that left consumers out in the cold.
Don’t let this post-trip extension take you for a bumpy ride.