There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
April 2018: A federal judge dismissed the complaint finding that plaintiffs failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
July 2017: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Petland, Inc. Among other things, the complaint alleges that the pet store franchise:
(Cisneros et al v. Petland, Inc., BKG Pets, Inc., Pets BKG LLC, PAWSitive Solutions, Inc., Case No. 17-cv-2828, S.D. Ga.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding pets and TINA.org’s coverage of the topic, click here.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.