PUMA. GO WILD.
Runner’s high – it’s a thing for a reason.
Pep Boys Prices
March 2018: A federal judge dismissed the complaint When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. finding that it failed to state a legally cognizable claim.
August 2017: Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint making similar allegations.
January 2017: This case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 17-cv-18, D. NJ.)
November 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Pep Boys for allegedly deceiving consumers by operating a two-tiered pricing scheme (i.e., charging in-store customers higher prices for auto parts than what is charged online). (Silver et al v. Pep Boys – Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc. et al, Case No. MER-L-2305-16, New Jersey State Court – Mercer County)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding automobiles and TINA.org’s coverage of them, click here.
The Latest
DSSRC’s Arbonne Decision Gets It Wrong
Council blesses MLM’s use of unsubstantiated earnings claims.
MyLowe’s Rewards Free Shipping
TINA.org hammers out the fine print details of this advertised member perk.
The Rise of ‘Bait-and- Switch Pricing’
Emily Stewart, Business Insider
TINA.org Finds U-Haul Using Bait-and-Switch Pricing Scheme
MADISON, CONN. May 6, 2025 – U-Haul is engaged in a bait-and-switch pricing scheme with its $19.95 truck rental ads, according to an investigation by consumer advocacy organization truthinadvertising.org (TINA.org).…