There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
October 2019: This case was voluntarily dismissed because the parties reached a settlement agreement, the terms of which have not been disclosed.
March 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against ENT Credit Union for allegedly misrepresenting that it does not charge overdraft fees on accounts if they have enough money to cover a transaction when, according to the complaint, the credit union does charge customers overdraft fees even when their accounts have enough money to cover transactions. (Nelson et al v ENT Credit Union, Case No. 19-cv-634, D. Colo.)
For more TINA.org’s coverage of banks, click here.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
Recent ad shows what it takes to make a comeback.
New research points to “no.”