Ergobaby Carriers
In late summer 2014, a class-action lawsuit was filed against The Ergo Baby Carrier Inc. for allegedly deceptively marketing the Ergobaby infant baby carrier. According to the complaint, the company…
In February 2018, a state court judge preliminarily approved a settlement agreement that would resolve a false advertising class-action lawsuit against Orbit Baby and The Ergo Baby Carrier. The complaint, which was originally filed in 2016, alleges that the companies falsely represent that infant and toddler car seats are free of certain unsafe chemicals, including brominated and chlorinated flame retardants, when they are not. According to the settlement terms, class members will receive a partial refund, the total amount depending on the number of car seats purchased and the number of class members who file claims. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for June 15, 2018. For more information, go to https://www.orbitbabyclassaction.com/. (Kopin et al v. Orbit Baby, Inc. and The Ergo Baby Carrier, Inc., Case No. RG16813239, California State Court – Alameda County)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against The Ergo Baby Carrier and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
In late summer 2014, a class-action lawsuit was filed against The Ergo Baby Carrier Inc. for allegedly deceptively marketing the Ergobaby infant baby carrier. According to the complaint, the company…
In October 2013, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Ergo Baby Carrier Inc. alleging that the company misleadingly advertises the Ergo Baby’s Organic Baby Carrier as suitable for newborns when,…
TINA.org investigates advertised milestone.
What consumers should know about a provision hidden in some employment contracts.
Getting a slice of this complimentary pie may be harder than you think.
What consumers should know about software tethering.
Chain faces lawsuit over meat filling representations.