The FTC is not anti-direct selling. It’s pro-truth in advertising.
The DSA misses the mark.
October 2015: As of October 9, 2015, all of the named plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their claims. To read each of the dismissals, click on the case name below.
Early 2015: Multiple lawsuits have been filed against Nutramax for allegedly falsely advertising that its dietary supplements containing glucosamine and chondroitin provide numerous joint health benefits without scientific evidence to support such claims. The lawsuits were transferred to one court where several lawsuits making similar allegations will be heard together. To read the individual complaints for each case, click on the case names below:
Although another lawsuit (Ferrell et al v. Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. et al, Case No. 14-cv-606, N. D. CA.) was also transferred to this court in March 2014, this case will not be heard with the others because the plaintiffs dismissed the claims.
(In Re: Nutramax Cosamin Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, D. MD., 14-cv-00124).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits against Nutramax and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding the marketing of glucosamine and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
The DSA misses the mark.
TINA.org reader takes issue with this product’s deceptive packaging.
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?