Fairlife Milk
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
In October 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Newell Brands and NUK USA for allegedly misleadingly marketing that NUK® Orthodontic Pacifiers promote healthy oral development in children and improve their dental health by correcting the position of teeth and jaws when, according to plaintiffs, the pacifiers do not provide the advertised dental health benefits. The complaint also claims that the marketing falsely represents that the pacifiers are safe for children 24 months and older without adequately disclosing the risks associated with using the pacifiers. (Benson et al v. Newell Brands Inc. and NUK USA LLC, Case No. 19-cv-6836, N. D. IL.)
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
Consumers balk at hidden junk fees.
As years pass and life shifts, the walls around us quietly hold every moment.
TINA.org uncovers the limits of this carrier’s “unlimited” data plans.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.