Optics Outfitter
Why this eyewear company’s advertised “starting” prices may not be 20/20.
August 2018: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement.
March 2018: A federal judge granted preliminary approval of the settlement agreement.
January 2018: Plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of a proposed settlement agreement. According to its terms, class members who were enrolled in a variable rate plan will receive a cash refund of at least $2, the exact amount dependent on how much electricity and natural gas was used. For more information, go to http://www.electricityandgassettlement.com/.
November 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against North American Power and Gas for allegedly deceptively inducing consumers to switch electricity suppliers. According to the complaint, the supplier offers consumers a low initial rates followed by a “variable rate” plan that is tied to the fluctuating market price when, according to the plaintiffs, the supplier’s rates only go up and consumers pay three to four times the market rate. (Edwards et al v. North American Power and Gas, L.L.C., Case No. 14-cv-01714, D. CT.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against energy suppliers and TINA.org’s coverage of the topic, click here.
For more information about bait-and-switch advertising, click here.
Why this eyewear company’s advertised “starting” prices may not be 20/20.
MADISON, CONN. Dec. 12, 2024— In a win for consumers, a court has ordered Quincy Bioscience to stop advertising Prevagen using memory-improvement claims. This follows a near-decade-long campaign by the…
What led up to brain supplement’s December to remember.
Jessica Bennett, The Cut
Getting lucky for this cheap may be harder than you think.