
CATrends: Deceptive ‘Plant-Based’ Claims
A deceptive marketing trend takes root.
December 2019: This case was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
February 2019: This action was stayed pending the resolution of a motion to compel arbitration.
January 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against USAA Federal Savings Bank for allegedly misleadingly promising that the bank charges only one non-sufficient fund fee on a transaction that is rejected because an account does not have enough money to cover the transaction when, according to the complaint, the bank charges a fee every time the transaction is re-submitted for payment and rejected resulting in customers being charged multiple fees on a single transaction. (Eiess et al v. USAA Federal Savings Bank, Case No. 19-cv-108, N. D. CA.)
For more information about class-action lawsuits filed against banks and TINA.org’s coverage of them, click here.
A deceptive marketing trend takes root.
Legislators should protect the work of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
What does “human-grade” dog food actually mean?
The statement, “Manufactured in the USA 100%,” had appeared on product packaging.
E.J. Schultz, Ad Age