Cariuma
Sneaker company modifies sponsored social media post following TINA.org inquiry.
Non-Sufficient Funds Fees at USAA Federal Savings Bank
December 2019: This case was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
February 2019: This action was stayed pending the resolution of a motion to compel arbitration.
January 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against USAA Federal Savings Bank for allegedly misleadingly promising that the bank charges only one non-sufficient fund fee on a transaction that is rejected because an account does not have enough money to cover the transaction when, according to the complaint, the bank charges a fee every time the transaction is re-submitted for payment and rejected resulting in customers being charged multiple fees on a single transaction. (Eiess et al v. USAA Federal Savings Bank, Case No. 19-cv-108, N. D. CA.)
For more information about class-action lawsuits filed against banks and TINA.org’s coverage of them, click here.
The Latest
Worst False Ad Settlements of 2023
Class-action settlements that left consumers behind this year.
Todd Snyder
“Sitewide” sale didn’t include all items for sale on the site.
Roblox Marketers Feel The Tension—Inside Brands’ Next Challenge On The Platform
Asa Hiken, Adage
Why is Walmart’s 13+ Roblox Game Displaying a COPPA Seal?
Only users who are 13 and older can enter Walmart Discovered.