Junk Fees at JFK, LaGuardia and Newark Airports
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?
October 2014: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.. The reasons have not been disclosed.
June 2014: A false advertising class-action lawsuit against the marketer of Nitrix, a dietary supplement, was transferred from state court to federal court. Among other things, plaintiffs claim that the company markets Nitrix as an Advanced Strength dietary supplement containing Arginine Ethyl Esther when, in reality, tests show that the supplement does not contain a detectable amount of the ingredient. (Conde et al v. Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition, Inc., Glanbia Public Ltd. Co., and Does 1-10, Case No. 14-cv-00945, C. D. CA.).
For more information about supplements, click here.
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?
Supplement maker agrees to pay $750K to settle deceptive health claims lawsuit.
Settlement comes after TINA.org exposed thousands of deceptive income claims.
TINA.org sheds light on confusing and misleading brightness claims.
Brant James, Ingame