1st Phorm’s ‘110% Money-Back Guarantee’
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against New Jersey Auto Auction for, among other things, allegedly deceptively selling vehicles at a higher price than the one advertised, in violation of New Jersey law. The lawsuit was originally filed in state court in December 2015 and transferred to federal court in January 2016. (Labidou et al v. Fleet Lease Network, Inc. d/b/a New Jersey Auto Auction et al, Case No. 16-cv-502, D. NJ.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding automobiles and TINA.org’s coverage of them, click here.
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.