Neuriva
TINA.org objected to unfair settlement that allows brain supplement company to continue deceiving consumers.
Neuriva
Case Name (Date)
Timmons et al. v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC and RB Health (US) LLC
25-cv-12192, N.D. Ill.
(Oct. 2025)
Product/Service
Neuriva Original, Neuriva Original Strawberry Gummies, Neuriva Plus, Neuriva Plus Strawberry Gummies, and Neuriva Ultra
Allegations
Falsely marketing that products help memory, focus, concentration, learning and accuracy when none of the ingredients provide the advertised benefits
Falsely marketing that products have been “clinically tested” to provide brain health benefits when a study performed by the company shows that they do not provide such benefits
Status
Pending
Legal Action
Class-Action Tracker
Neuriva
Allegations: Falsely marketing Neuriva supplements as “clinically proven” to improve “brain performance” when the company has no scientific or clinical proof that the supplements or ingredients in them provide the…
The Latest
TINA’s List
Readers have told us to look into these MLMs.
Advertising of Supplement Targeting Seniors Questioned
TINA.org Joins with AARP in Objecting to Move Free Class-Action Settlement MADISON, Conn., March 12, 2015 — More than 46 million people suffer from arthritis, many of them elderly, and…
Lawsuits: Glucosamine’s Promised Relief Mostly Marketing Hype
Consumers report adverse reactions.
Proposed Glucosamine Settlement Stiffs Consumers
Class-action settlement over supplement sold by Walmart, Walgreens and Supervalu provides little relief to consumers.
