Naked Juice
April 2014: The four appeals were voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which were not disclosed. Click on the links below to see each motion and order.
February 2014: Two more objectors (Henry and Weaver) filed Notices of Appeal regarding the approval of the settlement.
January 2014: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement. Later in January two objectors (Andersen and Rossignol) filed Notices of Appeal regarding the approval of the settlement.
August 2013: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement of a class-action lawsuit against Naked Juice Co. The complaint claims that the company falsely advertised its juices and smoothies as “all natural” and free of genetically modified ingredients when, according to plaintiffs, they are not. According to the settlement terms, class members may get a full refund of up to $75 with proof of purchase. In addition, the company agreed not to advertise products as “All Natural.” The company also agreed to have an independent testing organization, Eurofins GeneScan, substantiate Non-GMO statements on product labels for a minimum of three years, have a quality control manager oversee the independent testing process for a minimum of five years, and maintain a database of information about ingredients. (Pappas et al. v. Naked Juice Co of Glendora, Inc., et al., Case No. 11-cv-08276, C.D. CA.).
Class-Action Tracker
The Latest
CATrends: Baseball Ticket Prices
Consumers balk at hidden junk fees.
Benjamin Moore: Timeless
As years pass and life shifts, the walls around us quietly hold every moment.
Consumer Cellular
TINA.org uncovers the limits of this carrier’s “unlimited” data plans.
There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
TINA.org Action Sheds Light on SunPowerLED’s False Endorsement Claims
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.