Naked Juice
April 2014: The four appeals were voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which were not disclosed. Click on the links below to see each motion and order.
February 2014: Two more objectors (Henry and Weaver) filed Notices of Appeal regarding the approval of the settlement.
January 2014: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement. Later in January two objectors (Andersen and Rossignol) filed Notices of Appeal regarding the approval of the settlement.
August 2013: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement of a class-action lawsuit against Naked Juice Co. The complaint claims that the company falsely advertised its juices and smoothies as “all natural” and free of genetically modified ingredients when, according to plaintiffs, they are not. According to the settlement terms, class members may get a full refund of up to $75 with proof of purchase. In addition, the company agreed not to advertise products as “All Natural.” The company also agreed to have an independent testing organization, Eurofins GeneScan, substantiate Non-GMO statements on product labels for a minimum of three years, have a quality control manager oversee the independent testing process for a minimum of five years, and maintain a database of information about ingredients. (Pappas et al. v. Naked Juice Co of Glendora, Inc., et al., Case No. 11-cv-08276, C.D. CA.).
Class-Action Tracker
The Latest
How Ethos Sold Wall Street on AI While Powering an Analog Boiler Room
Jenny Ahn, Michelle Cera, Ruth Reader, Hunterbrook
CATrends: Unscented Deodorants and Antiperspirants
Lawsuits allege marketing doesn’t pass the smell test.
Ad Council: The Secret to Motherhood
Recent ad encourages mothers to prioritize their mental health.
HydroJug’s Heat-Retention Claims
Can these bottles really keep drinks hot for up to six hours?
With Personalized Pricing, Disclosure Is a Start, But Not a Finish Line
TINA.org and other consumer advocates file comment with FTC.