Influencers’ quiet disclosures lagged behind LVCVA’s loud promotion of Formula One race
Kyle Chouinard, Las Vegas Sun
MOTOACTV GPS Sports Watch
In February 2014, a federal judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit against Motorola because the parties settled all of the claims. The complaint, which was originally filed 2013, alleged that the company markets the MOTOACTV GPS sports watch as a rugged, durable, sweat-proof, and rain-resistant device when, in reality, the watch malfunctions when it comes in contact with sweat and moisture. The judge dismissed the case with prejudice, meaning that the plaintiffs cannot refile. The terms of the settlement could not be determined. (Connery et al v. Motorola Mobility, Inc. and Motorola Solutions, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-06395, S. D. NY.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits against Motorola and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
The Latest
Regulators Deliver Actions against HelloFresh
Regulatory activity following TINA.org’s 2022 complaint.
JetBlue’s ‘Flight Disruptions’ Refund Policy
Clear policy or moving target?
LifeLock’s Identity Theft Protection
Is your Social Security number as vulnerable as this company claims?
The McRib
Lawsuit alleges the McRib is a McScam.