Every Day Can Be Iconic with a TK Maxx Deal
The cat’s out the (red) bag.
Missouri Vioxx
Despite denying any wrongdoing, Merck & Co. has agreed to settle a class-action lawsuit filed against it in 2004 in Missouri state court. The lawsuit alleged that Merck violated the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act by promoting and selling Vioxx after it was pulled from the market for doubling users’ risk of having a heart attack or stroke. Missouri residents who purchased Vioxx can file a claim to receive a payment of either $180 if they don’t have proof of purchase, or $90 for each month they purchased the drug if they do have proof of purchase. For more information, go to www.VioxxMOClass.com. (Mary Plubell and Ted Ivey v. Merck & Co., Inc., Case No. 04CV235817-01).
The Latest
Fairlife Milk
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
CATrends: Baseball Ticket Prices
Consumers balk at hidden junk fees.
Consumer Cellular
TINA.org uncovers the limits of this carrier’s “unlimited” data plans.
There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.