Brainowl’s ‘Free’ IQ Test
“Free” offer could prove costly.
Mosseri et al. v. Miracle Moo, Inc.
24-cv-3414, S.D.N.Y.
(May 2024)
Miracle Moo bovine colostrum dietary supplements
Falsely marketing products as having “scientific validation,” being “powered by science,” and being “clinically dosed” to provide various health benefits – including enhancing immunity, fortifying the gut, easing digestive discomfort, inducing hair growth, and enhancing muscle repair – when none of the advertised health benefits have been scientifically proven
Making improper disease-treatment claims without including FDA-required disclosures
Settled and dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
“Free” offer could prove costly.
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
Consumers balk at hidden junk fees.
TINA.org uncovers the limits of this carrier’s “unlimited” data plans.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.