
1st Phorm’s ‘110% Money-Back Guarantee’
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Prescott et al. v. Dos Toros LLC et al.
22-cv-2425, S.D.N.Y.
(March 2022)
Products containing pork and chicken
Falsely advertising that meats come from chickens and pigs that have been naturally and humanely raised when the meats come from animals raised in industrial facilities that do not give animals access to the outdoors
Pending
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.