Marriott Hotels in Los Angeles
Case Name (Date)
Baek et al. v. Marriott International, Inc. et al.
23-cv-5944, C.D. Cal.
(July 2023)
Product/Service
Marriott Hotels in Los Angeles
Allegations
Failing to include a $10-$14 “Hotel Worker Protection Ordinance Costs Surcharge” in advertised room rates and misrepresenting that the fee goes toward the cost of complying with a Los Angeles ordinance when the amount consumers are charged is more than it costs to comply with the ordinance
Status
Settled and voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.
Class-Action Tracker
Cruises for Marriott Vacation Club Destinations Program Members
Restaurants at The Ritz-Carlton Hotels
The Latest
Valentine’s Day Deception: Don’t Fall for These Bad Ads
From “Belgian” chocolates made in the U.S. to knockoff engagement rings, be wary of these roadblocks to love.
The Grand Cayman Marriott Beach(less) Resort?
Hotel homepage paints a pretty picture of the oceanfront accessible to guests but not an accurate one.