Fairlife Milk
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
In November 2012, a federal judge preliminarily approved the $9.9 million that Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc. and its marketing subcontractors are agreeing to pay to settle a class-action lawsuit. The suit claimed that they sent unsolicited text spam as part of a 2008 back-to-school promotion. The lawsuit was originally filed in 2010 on behalf of consumers who received the Lucky Brand text spam between August 24 and September 15, 2008. Those consumers will receive up to $100 under the settlement. (Robles v. Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc., Case No. 10-cv-4846).
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
Consumers balk at hidden junk fees.
TINA.org uncovers the limits of this carrier’s “unlimited” data plans.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.