There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
July 2014: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
January 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Linens ‘n Things for allegedly falsely marketing many of its textile products – including bedding, towels, and sheets – on its website. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that the company misleadingly represents products are made from bamboo when, according to the complaint, they are made from bamboo derivatives such as rayon. (Wolf et al v. LNT Acquisition LLC d/b/a Linens ‘n Things, Case No. 14-cv-00407, D. NJ.).
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.