
1st Phorm’s ‘110% Money-Back Guarantee’
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Davis et al. v. LifeRX.MD, Inc.
25-cv-9997, S.D.N.Y.
(Feb. 2025)
LifeRx
Misrepresenting that it does not sell or share consumers’ personal information when it shares such information with several advertising partners – including X Corp. (f/k/a Twitter), Pinterest, Microsoft, Google, and Taboola – for targeted advertising purposes
Pending
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.