There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
June 2019: This case was voluntarily dismissed because the parties reached a settlement agreement.
February 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Le Tote, Inc. (a web-based company that offers a clothing rental subscription service) for allegedly failing to adequately present the terms of its automatic renewal and continuous service offers resulting in subscribers being charged without their consent. (Vasquez-Cossio et al v. Le Tote, Inc., Case No. 19-cv-347, C.D. Cal.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of negative option offers, click here.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.