Kashi Ripe Strawberry Soft Baked Breakfast Bars
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the ingredients in bars
August 2013: Perel was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled. in order to pursue the claims as part of the consolidated action in California, Saubers v. Kashi.
May 2013: Norwood was consolidated with two related cases (Saubers v. Kashi and Burns v. Kashi).
April 2013: Two class-action lawsuits were filed against Kashi Co. in April 2013 for misleadingly listing “evaporated cane juice” and “evaporated cane juice syrup” as ingredients in some of its food products, instead of listing plain old “sugar.” To see each complaint, click on the links below.
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the ingredients in bars
Allegations: Cereals contain less protein than advertised
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “Made With Wildflower Honey” when honey is not the predominant sweetening ingredient
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the ingredients in breakfast bars
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the ingredients used in the fruit filling and as the primary sweetener in products
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the ingredients that are in the filling of Kashi bars
September 2015: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled. as a result of a settlement agreement…
April 2016: This appeal was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.. February 2016: After this settlement was approved, a Notice of Appeal was…
September 2014: A federal judge granted final approval of this class-action settlement. July 2014: A federal judge preliminarily approved the settlement to this class-action lawsuit. The settlement terms are discussed…
How much of the real fruit pictured on the label actually makes it in these products?
Tallying up added sugars wasn’t easy.