
Joe’s Jeans
July 2017: A state court judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement.
March 2017: A state court judge preliminarily approved a settlement of this action. The settlement, which was amended in November 2016 and February 2017, also resolves two related lawsuits:
- Noiman v. Hudson Clothing, LLC, Case No. 37-2015-566, San Diego Superior Court
- Schulert v. Hudson Clothing, LLC, Case No. 15-cv-276, D. ME.
According to the settlement terms, class members may receive one tote bag worth $55 or one t-shirt worth $68 for each product purchased. In addition, the company agreed to comply laws that govern Made in USA marketing. A final approval hearing is scheduled for July 28, 2017. For more information, go to http://www.joesjeanssettlement.com/.
March 2016: An amended complaint making the same claims was filed.
July 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Joe’s Jeans for allegedly labelling jeans as being “Made in USA” when, according to plaintiffs, they contain foreign-made parts. (Card et al v. Joe’s Jeans, Inc. and Does 1-100, Case No. 37-2015-00021834, California Superior Court – County of San Diego)
For more information about Made in the USA claims, click here.
Class-Action Tracker

The Latest

ARMRA Colostrum Supplements
Company distances itself from touted “studies” while continuing to use deceptive health claims.

Amazon $700 Weekly Vehicle Advertisement Program
Can you earn a salary just by placing a small sticker on your car?

CATrends: Fish Oil Supplements Marketed to Support Heart Health
Lawsuits accuse companies of using deceptive claims to reel in consumers.

Huel
U.K. ad regulator takes issue with celeb endorsement.

BART
Why “taking BART” from Oakland to San Francisco costs more than advertised in this billboard.