
These Super Bowl LVIII Advertisers Have Been Taken to Court for Deceptive Marketing
Several of this year’s Super Bowl advertisers have run into legal trouble for alleged deceptive marketing.
September 2017: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. because the parties reached a resolution of all the claims, the terms of which were not disclosed.
June 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against iSpring Water Systems for allegedly falsely marketing water filtration systems as made in the United States when, according to plaintiffs, the products are either wholly or partially made outside the U.S. (Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint later in the month.) (O’Sullivan et al v. iSpring Water Systems, LLC, Case No. 17-cv-2237, N. D. GA.)
For more information about made in the USA claims, click here.
Several of this year’s Super Bowl advertisers have run into legal trouble for alleged deceptive marketing.
Consumer complaints regarding alleged surprise charges are piling up.
Holy crop.
It’s not the first time the company has been accused of pulling a bait and switch.
Company makes marketing changes following TINA.org inquiry.