The FTC is not anti-direct selling. It’s pro-truth in advertising.
The DSA misses the mark.
iFIT
Case Name (Date)
Balfour et al. v. iFIT Health and Fitness, Inc.
23-cv-67, D. Del.
(Jan. 2023)
Baron et al. v. iFIT Health and Fitness, Inc.
22-cv-1304, D. Del.
(Oct. 2022)
Product/Service
NordicTrack, ProForm, Freemotion and other brands of at-home fitness equipment with iFIT
Allegations
Marketing that fitness equipment with iFIT has the ability to stream fitness classes when the videos stop streaming or repeatedly freeze due to a defect
Status
Balfour case: Settled
(Preliminarily approved)
https://ifitconsolesettlement.com/
Baron case: Stayed
The Latest
Ocean Spray Cranberry Juice Blend
TINA.org reader takes issue with this product’s deceptive packaging.
Lens.com
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
On Shoes
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Junk Fees at JFK, LaGuardia and Newark Airports
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?