IcyHot Patch

Fuller et al v. Chattem, Inc.
21-cv-5436, N.D. Cal.
(April 2021)

IcyHot Patch

Making misleading pain relief claims

Misleadingly marketing the product as “Max Strength Lidocaine” when other products deliver more lidocaine and are more effective

Misleadingly marketing the patch as “fast acting” when it does not provide immediate pain relief

Falsely claiming that the product provides 12 hours of pain relief when it does not stay on for even six hours

Falsely marketing product as compliant with FDA regulations when it is not

Pending

Get the dirt on this company’s “risk-free” trial.

TINA.org sheds light on medical device company’s marketing claims.

Ancestry.com

TINA.org uncovers questionable roots behind this “free” offer.

These claims to detect intolerances to more than 200 foods are tough to stomach.

Lawsuits challenge American-made claims.