Hudson Clothing’s Made in USA Claims
June 2017: A state court judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement.
March 2017: A state court judge preliminarily approved a settlement that resolves both the Noiman and Schulert actions. The settlement, which was amended in November 2016 and February 2017, also resolves another related lawsuit: Card et al v. Joe’s Jeans, Inc.
According to the settlement terms, class members may receive one tote bag worth $55 or one t-shirt worth $68 for each product purchased. In addition, the company agreed to comply with laws that govern Made in USA marketing. A final approval hearing is scheduled for July 28, 2017. For more information, go to http://www.joesjeanssettlement.com/.
December 2016: This action was stayed until September 1, 2017, at which time the parties will determine if a dismissal of this case is appropriate based on the outcome of other related California actions, Noiman v. Hudson Clothing and Card v. Joe’s Jeans.
July 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Hudson Clothing alleging that the company misleadingly labels Hudson jeans as “Made in USA” when, according to plaintiffs, the jeans actually contain foreign-made parts. (Schulert et al v. Hudson Clothing, LLC, Case No. 15-cv-00276, D. ME.)
For more information about “Made in USA” claims and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
The Latest
Owner of FabKids, JustFab and ShoeDazzle Settles Deception Charges
Refunds for consumers duped into signing up for “VIP” memberships.
Mario Badescu’s Rosewater Facial Spray
Rosewater ingredient claims wilt upon a closer look.
Cascade ‘Free & Clear’ Dish Detergents
What does this marketing term mean?
Quality Inn & Suites (Choice Hotels)
Guests say online pictures are misleading.
Spirit Halloween Costumes
What you see on the website may not be what you get.