There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
In March 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Healthy Paws Pet Insurance for allegedly falsely representing that the company is only allowed to change the amount of monthly premiums to reflect changes in the costs of veterinary medicine when, according to plaintiffs, the company increases the monthly premiums based on other factors, including a pet’s age. (Benanav et al v. Healthy Paws Pet Insurance LLC, Case No. 20-cv-421, W.D. Wash.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of pet products, click here.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.