Fairlife Milk
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
In September 2016, a state judge granted final approval of a settlement of a class-action lawsuit against Good Karma Foods. The complaint, which was originally filed in 2014, alleged that the company markets Good Karma flax milk as being natural when the milk really has artificial and synthetic ingredients. The settlement provides class members with monetary and injunctive relief. Class members may receive:
for up to 10 cartons. In addition, the company agreed not to use the phrase “all natural” in the marketing for the products at issue and not to use the word “natural” to refer to any attribute or ingredient of the products at issue, unless expressly permitted by federal labeling regulations. (Tran et al v. Good Food Technologies, Inc. et al, Case No. BC561218, Superior Court of California – County of Los Angeles)
For more information about natural claims and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
Consumers balk at hidden junk fees.
TINA.org uncovers the limits of this carrier’s “unlimited” data plans.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.