
1st Phorm’s ‘110% Money-Back Guarantee’
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Betzag et al. v. BP Products North America Inc.
23-cv-9602, E.D.N.Y.
(Dec. 2023)
Amoco gas
Charging more than the price advertised in roadside signs and failing to adequately disclose that the advertised price is what consumers pay if they use cash, but that they pay more if they use a different payment method
Pending
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.