There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
In November 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against HSBC Bank for allegedly misleadingly promising that it charges customers only one insufficient funds fee on a single transaction if an account does not have enough funds to cover a transaction when, according to plaintiffs, the bank routine charges multiple insufficient funds fees on the same transaction. (Chambers et al v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., Case No. 19-cv-10436, S. D. NY.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of banks, click here.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.