data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0ba7/d0ba726e28a19fd33a1229400699ed0124082494" alt=""
Purina, Fancy Feast, Other Pet Foods
Allegations: False natural claims
November 2019: The case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled..
June 2019: Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint.
May 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Nestle Purina PetCare for allegedly misleadingly labeling Fancy Feast tuna products as being “Dolphin Safe” and sustainably sourced when, according to plaintiffs, dolphins and other marine life are killed and injured by the fishing methods used to catch the tuna in the products. (Myers et al v. Nestle Purina PetCare Co., Case No. 19-cv-898, C.D. Cal.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of the marketing of tuna products, click here.
Allegations: False natural claims
January 2016: Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the December 2015 Order. (Barber et al v. Nestle USA, Inc. et al, Case No. 16-55041, 9th Cir.) December 2015: A…
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
No eyebrows were harmed in the making of this Crazy Puffs commercial
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.
Be wary of these life-changing claims.