BART
Why “taking BART” from Oakland to San Francisco costs more than advertised in this billboard.
Equaline Maximum Strength Lidocaine Patches
Case Name (Date)
Sheiner et al. v. Supervlau Inc.
22-cv-10262, S.D.N.Y.
(Dec. 2022)
Product/Service
Equaline Maximum Strength Lidocaine Patches
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing that products provide “Up to 8 Hours of Relief” when they do not adhere for eight hours
Misleadingly marketing products as “Maximum Strength” when they do not stay on for eight hours and, as a result, they do not deliver the “Maximum Strength” amount of lidocaine
Misleadingly marketing that products “Desensitize Aggravated Nerves” when patches are not capable of providing such relief
Status
Pending
The Latest
Breaking Down the Relationship between Brands and Teens
Today’s teenagers are uniquely positioned in the marketing world.
FTC Bans Fake Reviews
New rule also targets paid reviews.
Virgin Atlantic: ‘100% Sustainable Aviation Fuel’
Ad regulator finds term potentially misleading in context of radio ad.
College HUNKS’ Unattractive Side
TINA.org reader says moving company failed to live up to its ads. She’s not the only one.