Jury Hands Down a Verdict in Prevagen Deceptive Marketing Case
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
In December 2015, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Swiss-American Products, Inc. for allegedly deceptively labeling EltaMD UV Aero sunscreen as SPF 45 when it is actually only SPF 18. (Dayan et al v. Swiss-American Products, Inc., Case No. 15-cv-6895, E. D. NY.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding sunscreen products and TINA.org’s coverage of the product, click here.
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
Regulators have a beef with company’s climate pledge.
Consumers need to be wary of undisclosed incentivized reviews.
Why TINA.org supports FTC’s proposed changes to COPPA Rule but pushes for more.
FTC alleges company pressures consumers into overpaying for its tax filing software.